After witnessing her son’s homicide on nationwide tv, Kurt Vonnegut’s fictitious Hazel Bergeron responds absent mindedly, “Gee…. I might inform that one was a doozy.” Within the brief story “Harrison Bergeron,” Vonnegut explores a future through which the federal government makes everybody equal, via absurd devices. Much like different dystopias, the highly effective eat these with out energy at nice price, however what makes this brief story distinctive is that it ends with out a imaginative and prescient to resolve the insanity. It identifies the problem, making it bigger than life with a purpose to horrify readers, nevertheless it fails to discover a answer—presumably, this improper stability of energy will proceed on with Harrison Bergeron’s demise.
Whereas The Stepford Wives offers an apparent ethical challenge with the killing of 1’s spouse to interchange her with a robotic, the Apple tv collection Severance offers extra subtly with the morality of making folks with a purpose to eat their efforts.
Tales like “Harrison Bergeron” take one’s pure incapability to like thy neighbor and stretch it to its limits to see what may occur. Within the case of “Harrison Bergeron,” it ends in a society the place everybody experiences inhumane remedy by the hands of the highly effective. Equally, in Ira Levin’s novel The Stepford Wives and in Apple TV’s Severance, the highly effective eat the efforts and humanity of the folks they’re supposed to guard. In The Stepford Wives, husbands homicide and exchange their wives with literal robots who cook dinner, clear, and submit mindlessly, whereas in Severance, the Lumon company divides the consciousness of workplace employees, creating two consciousnesses that exist in the identical physique but are managed by workplace administration. Each tales impel us to think about a world the place people societally commodify different people, however in the long run, we’re left needing an answer to the insanity.
A Spouse Consumed
In his novel The Stepford Wives, Ira Levin presents idyllic Stepford, full with completely happy husbands, who spend their evenings on the secretive Males’s Affiliation, and submissive wives, who spend their days trying flawless and waxing their flooring. As the most recent neighbor, Joanna Eberhart can not fathom why these girls are solely eager about their houses, however she finds mates in Bobbie and Charmaine, who moved into Stepford not lengthy earlier than her. Joanna turns into more and more suspicious and remoted when Charmaine abruptly tears up her beloved clay tennis court docket (so she will be able to exchange it with a placing inexperienced for her husband) and exchanges all of her private pursuits for a newfound dedication to cleansing her house; a few month later, Bobbie undergoes the same change.
Whereas trendy language tends to take the time period “Stepford spouse” and apply it to a girl who likes to maintain her home clear and take care of her household, this isn’t an correct illustration of Levin’s imaginative and prescient. It’s price noting that he wrote this novel within the early ’70s—a unique political panorama from the one we stay in now—and as Peter Straub factors out within the novel’s introduction, “it is a novel that satirizes its oppressors and their wishes, not their victims” (xi). In different phrases, Levin will not be out to criticize girls who get pleasure from homemaking; he’s out to criticize those that eat them.
A Stepford spouse is a commodity, created by the egocentric creativeness of her Stepford husband. The Stepford girls are described as useless and robotic, fixated on the cleanliness of their houses and the happiness of their husbands on the expense of every part else—they drop all of their hobbies, pursuits, jobs, and autonomy. They spend their days and nights talking sweetly to their households, getting ready meals, sustaining their houses, and sexually pleasuring their husbands, and whereas their husbands stay like kings, it’s not clear how their kids fare (when Joanna attends parent-teacher conferences, she notes that the occasion is ill-attended by both dad or mum, hinting that Stepford moms aren’t eager about their kids). The twisted creativeness of the Stepford males is finest illustrated when Joanna’s husband, Walter, invitations mates from the Males’s Affiliation over for drinks. Joanna joins their dialog earlier than realizing that Ike Mazzard, {a magazine} illustrator identified for sketching “dream ladies,” is sketching her. Everybody falls into uncomfortable silence, the lads are embarrassed, and Joanna receives a “flattering” sketch by the top of it; the remainder he retains. The boys have engaged her in dialog with a purpose to distract her from their precise objective: to design a “dream model” of Joanna Eberhart who will finally exchange the precise Joanna. Later, she’ll notice the Stepford males are proficient in vinyl polymers, engineering, electronics, and animatronics, the proper credentials to create subservient robots. The Stepford males are usually not eager about wives or companions; they’re eager about making a product that can fulfill their wants with none reciprocal effort on their half.
Sadly for the Stepford wives, Levin doesn’t present any type of redemptive future for the city of Stepford. In the long run Joanna, on the verge of a breakdown and rightfully paranoid, follows the city’s males to fulfill the brand new Bobbie in her kitchen. Brandishing a butcher knife, Bobbie tells Joanna that she is going to minimize herself to show that she remains to be in a position to bleed–nonetheless human, nonetheless Bobbie. Joanna strikes nearer to witness this proof earlier than we’re abruptly taken to a different day months later on the native grocery store. We’re drawn into the angle of the most recent resident, Ruthanne, who sees Joanna buying, her cart and look completely tidy. When Ruthanne asks Joanna about her pictures, she admits that she dropped it to pursue housekeeping. Ruthanne is stunned however returns house to speak along with her husband about their getaway the next weekend, which we all know would be the demise of Ruthanne and the addition of one more Stepford spouse into the group. So the cycle continues, for ever and ever and no answer supplied.
A Consciousness Consumed
Whereas The Stepford Wives offers an apparent ethical challenge with the killing of 1’s spouse to interchange her with a robotic, the Apple tv collection Severance offers extra subtly with the morality of making folks with a purpose to eat their efforts. On this collection, staff of biotechnology company Lumon endure a process that leaves them consciously severed, with a brand new consciousness current solely inside of labor, whereas their common consciousness exists as regular exterior of labor. Known as “innies” and “outies,” the one has no reminiscence or realization of the opposite, though they exist in the identical physique. The controversy over the severance process is multi-faceted: folks condemn the “outies” who’ve undergone the process as unethical; traders and supporters applaud the ingenuity of Lumon; and (it’s revealed later) inside leaders of Lumon eat the interior consciousness seemingly for his or her private achieve.
The consumption of the interior consciousness will not be instantly obvious, for the reason that process appears to profit those that have undergone it. In an commercial, Lumon describes the innies as relations who share the identical beliefs and are excited to uphold the work of their firm. Mark, the protagonist, initially appreciates the process as a result of it permits him to work his workplace job and neglect in regards to the demise of his spouse for eight hours. Mark’s innie co-workers obtain prizes and affirmations after they do their job effectively, and so they’ve come to just accept that life inside Lumon is all they bear in mind.
When Helly is launched, her discontentment threatens Lumon’s steady workplace life and challenges us to think about the ethics of a severed consciousness. Whereas her interior workplace life begins by watching a video of herself peacefully consenting to the severance process, Helly refuses to just accept the workplace life she has been given. She persistently makes an attempt to ship a message to her outie, satisfied that if her outie knew how sad she was, she would present compassion and permit Helly to give up. Believing administration is stopping the switch of messages, she tries to supply her discover of resignation on her physique, in her physique, and even via a damaged glass window, slashing her arms within the course of. Lastly, she forces administration to file her resignation video to her outie, however she rapidly receives a recorded response from her outie, threatening and disparaging her: “I perceive that you just’re sad with the life that you just’ve been given. However what? Ultimately, all of us have to just accept actuality. So right here it’s. I’m an individual. You aren’t. I make the choices. You don’t.” Whereas co-workers and administration look on unfazed, on this second, Helly realizes that she has no autonomy or acknowledged personhood. Her interior consciousness is on the mercy of her outer consciousness, and she is going to spend the remainder of her days waking within the elevator, working her eight-hour shift, coming into the elevator to return house, after which instantly exiting the elevator to work her eight-hour shift, till—effectively, we’re undecided when the cycle will finish. That is their lives now.
A Love-Thy-Neighbor Kind of Imaginative and prescient
Whereas John Calvin by no means wrote fictional something (that we all know of), his consideration of the best commandment in Mark 12 means that his dystopia may look just like The Stepford Wives, Severance, and different tales like these: “It’s a mercenary love which the kids of the world entertain for one another, as a result of each certainly one of them has regard to his personal benefit.” A mercenary love is one which loves for one’s private achieve versus loving for the nice of one other. It’s a distorted imaginative and prescient of the biblical command to “love thy neighbor as thyself,” first introduced within the Outdated Testomony and later affirmed by Christ himself, and it makes use of, terrorizes, and dehumanizes fellow man. In tales that commodify people, we see this mercenary love, this distortion of Christ’s command to like thy neighbor, stretched to absurd limits, and we’re horrified.
I don’t count on Severance to provide a perfected answer at its collection’ finish, however in gentle of inconclusive endings, we’re left questioning: the place is the choice imaginative and prescient to the mercenary hellscapes supplied? Severance creator Dan Erickson has supplied hints of what that answer may seem like: “I simply hope that individuals do not forget that they’re much more necessary as human beings than they’re as cogs in an organization. As a result of we’re all cooler, weirder and extra attention-grabbing than the worth we’ve to somebody’s backside line.” Erickson’s need is that viewers will worth their humanity, the individuality that makes them human.
The decision to like one’s neighbor takes this recognition of 1’s humanity and applies it outwardly, to others. It destroys hierarchy, ranges the bottom on which everybody stands, and calls for that we love our fellow people with the identical dignity that we present ourselves. In God’s imaginative and prescient of neighbor loving neighbor, we’re not left questioning what this love ought to seem like or the way it needs to be outlined. In accordance with Jesus, the second command is outlined by the opening strains of the Shema—“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.” Who God is precedes the flexibility for love of neighbor, offering the “why” of loving one’s neighbor—the command offers the “how” of residing in a world through which that dignity is honored and upheld.
Levin and Erickson have invited us right into a world the place the biblical cost to like thy neighbor is opposed, however now we’re left questioning: is there one other approach, an alternate imaginative and prescient that pulls out what the world may seem like if this command was adopted? I might argue that there’s:
Eager to justify himself the lawyer requested Jesus, “And who’s my neighbor?”
A husband referred to as to like his spouse grew bored with her, murdered her, and changed her with a machine that would serve his each want.
A frontrunner who promised to do good created an interior consciousness, took benefit of her, and violated the dedication to honor her as household.
An outcast occurred upon a person who was badly injured, cared for him like he liked him, and supplied for all of his wants.
However who is my neighbor?
“The one who had mercy on the person.”
Jesus instructed him, “You go, and do likewise.”
Supply hyperlink
